7 Comments

Great piece Ryan. This is just another reminder of the negative effects of overzealous zoning regulations. Essentially, we can think of zoning regulations as a subtle means of transferring wealth from those who own property to those who do not.

Local boards and city governments become captured by landowners/homeowners who have every incentive to design the rules to inflate the value of their properties. This is not optimal for a number of reasons, it exacerbates the cost of housing, widens wealth inequality, and weakens our ability to take advantage of the scaling benefits that cities provide: https://www.lianeon.org/p/let-a-thousand-skyscrapers-bloom

Keep giving us examples, I am sure they are endless.

Expand full comment

Thank you! The well is deep on this topic, unfortunately. The good news is that we are showing it is possible to break free of capture.

Expand full comment

You missed the obvious, and epic, pun: "Baby Got Back(Yard)"

Expand full comment

Haha! I'll save it for a follow-up piece.

Expand full comment

Interesting - keep them coming!

Expand full comment

Our 2 year election cycle never gets us the long term well thought out plans to deal with the infrastructure problems that come with more dense populations.

The affordable housing usually means government subsidized. The ratio of affordable to luxury housing is always a delicate balance. It happened in the town I grew up in. There was nothing luxurious about the housing but “affordable” took over. Once the social and economic problems reared their ugly heads home prices took a nose dive and the dominos started falling.

Negotiating with the politicians, developers, and the communities take a special person….sounds like a business opportunity! I enjoyed the article, thank you!

Expand full comment

Thanks for highlighting the various ways in which planning and zoning regs shape or distort how our cities develop

Expand full comment